starred/vaultwarden
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden.git synced 2026-02-05 00:29:40 +03:00
Code Issues 32 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Docker image for aarch64 not available #90

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-04 16:53:15 +03:00 by OVERLORD · 11 comments
OVERLORD commented 2026-02-04 16:53:15 +03:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @Proximyst on GitHub (Sep 16, 2018).

I set up mprasil/bitwarden:raspberry on Docker with the commands listed. When it starts, it instantly exits with error 139 and no logs.

# docker volume create bitwarden_data
bitwarden_data
# docker run --name bitwarden -d --net localnet --ip 172.20.0.30 -v bitwarden_data:/data mprasil/bitwarden:raspberry
af8b74b4c7ae5aa3488d4c406bd9eb6af84218832c1c9b4dbc53c8c2c268415a

# docker ps -a
CONTAINER ID        IMAGE                         COMMAND                  CREATED             STATUS                       PORTS                                                              NAMES
af8b74b4c7ae        mprasil/bitwarden:raspberry   "/usr/bin/entry.sh /…"   3 seconds ago       Exited (139) 2 seconds ago                                                                      bitwarden

# docker logs bitwarden
# docker info
--snip--
Server Version: 17.12.1-ce
Kernel Version: 4.4.127-mainline-rev1
Operating System: Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS
OSType: linux
Architecture: aarch64
CPUs: 6
Total Memory: 3.849GiB
--snip--

What does this error mean and how may I go around it? Would it be possible to log the errors' actual meaning? Possibly other logs too, if those aren't already there?

Originally created by @Proximyst on GitHub (Sep 16, 2018). I set up mprasil/bitwarden:raspberry on Docker with the commands listed. When it starts, it instantly exits with error 139 and no logs. ```bash # docker volume create bitwarden_data bitwarden_data # docker run --name bitwarden -d --net localnet --ip 172.20.0.30 -v bitwarden_data:/data mprasil/bitwarden:raspberry af8b74b4c7ae5aa3488d4c406bd9eb6af84218832c1c9b4dbc53c8c2c268415a # docker ps -a CONTAINER ID IMAGE COMMAND CREATED STATUS PORTS NAMES af8b74b4c7ae mprasil/bitwarden:raspberry "/usr/bin/entry.sh /…" 3 seconds ago Exited (139) 2 seconds ago bitwarden # docker logs bitwarden # docker info --snip-- Server Version: 17.12.1-ce Kernel Version: 4.4.127-mainline-rev1 Operating System: Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS OSType: linux Architecture: aarch64 CPUs: 6 Total Memory: 3.849GiB --snip-- ``` What does this error mean and how may I go around it? Would it be possible to log the errors' actual meaning? Possibly other logs too, if those aren't already there?
OVERLORD added the enhancement label 2026-02-04 16:53:15 +03:00
OVERLORD commented 2026-02-04 16:53:27 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@mprasil commented on GitHub (Sep 16, 2018):

Can you post output of uname -mpi? The image is compiled for armhf I wonder if it's not arm64 vs armhf incompatibility. Can you try starting the container with -ti instead of -d to start in foreground?

@mprasil commented on GitHub (Sep 16, 2018): Can you post output of `uname -mpi`? The image is compiled for `armhf` I wonder if it's not `arm64` vs `armhf` incompatibility. Can you try starting the container with `-ti` instead of `-d` to start in foreground?
OVERLORD commented 2026-02-04 16:53:33 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Proximyst commented on GitHub (Sep 23, 2018):

Sorry for the late answer. Here is the output (which from Bitwarden's side is nothing):

# docker run --name bitwarden -ti --net localnet --ip 172.20.0.31 -v bitwarden_data:/data mprasil/bitwarden:raspberry
Unable to find image 'mprasil/bitwarden:raspberry' locally
raspberry: Pulling from mprasil/bitwarden
2e5bbd238113: Pull complete 
bd5466922a3e: Pull complete 
daa1e16babb1: Pull complete 
d74f0fdf7ee1: Pull complete 
b56eab80ec08: Pull complete 
49556fc391a1: Pull complete 
a5faa670d2c1: Pull complete 
7adbedd4cfa5: Pull complete 
6e4fd8ca118c: Pull complete 
16bd19f52442: Pull complete 
a417d35bcf5a: Pull complete 
902f93d33ab4: Pull complete 
420a0b18a3fd: Pull complete 
83eabeb992e4: Pull complete 
978cd9a983e9: Pull complete 
d203a31a0417: Pull complete 
57e31b501fe9: Pull complete 
5d8170298b99: Pull complete 
44cf28adb87b: Pull complete 
3beba8d81308: Pull complete 
be84d0ec5881: Pull complete 
Digest: sha256:659c073aaf005df12d9cb6ae1ee2c643ff42e3141d7b85cc0764ffbcfa127c88
Status: Downloaded newer image for mprasil/bitwarden:raspberry
# ls /var/lib/docker/volumes/bitwarden_data/_data/
# docker logs bitwarden
# uname -mpi
aarch64 aarch64 aarch64
@Proximyst commented on GitHub (Sep 23, 2018): Sorry for the late answer. Here is the output (which from Bitwarden's side is nothing): ``` # docker run --name bitwarden -ti --net localnet --ip 172.20.0.31 -v bitwarden_data:/data mprasil/bitwarden:raspberry Unable to find image 'mprasil/bitwarden:raspberry' locally raspberry: Pulling from mprasil/bitwarden 2e5bbd238113: Pull complete bd5466922a3e: Pull complete daa1e16babb1: Pull complete d74f0fdf7ee1: Pull complete b56eab80ec08: Pull complete 49556fc391a1: Pull complete a5faa670d2c1: Pull complete 7adbedd4cfa5: Pull complete 6e4fd8ca118c: Pull complete 16bd19f52442: Pull complete a417d35bcf5a: Pull complete 902f93d33ab4: Pull complete 420a0b18a3fd: Pull complete 83eabeb992e4: Pull complete 978cd9a983e9: Pull complete d203a31a0417: Pull complete 57e31b501fe9: Pull complete 5d8170298b99: Pull complete 44cf28adb87b: Pull complete 3beba8d81308: Pull complete be84d0ec5881: Pull complete Digest: sha256:659c073aaf005df12d9cb6ae1ee2c643ff42e3141d7b85cc0764ffbcfa127c88 Status: Downloaded newer image for mprasil/bitwarden:raspberry # ls /var/lib/docker/volumes/bitwarden_data/_data/ # docker logs bitwarden # uname -mpi aarch64 aarch64 aarch64 ```
OVERLORD commented 2026-02-04 16:53:37 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@mprasil commented on GitHub (Sep 24, 2018):

Can you check the architecture differences? I've posted the commands above.

@mprasil commented on GitHub (Sep 24, 2018): Can you check the architecture differences? I've posted the commands above.
OVERLORD commented 2026-02-04 16:53:42 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Proximyst commented on GitHub (Sep 26, 2018):

@mprasil That's what I did in the above snippet (--name bitwarden -ti --net for -ti and bottom command for uname)

@Proximyst commented on GitHub (Sep 26, 2018): @mprasil That's what I did in the above snippet (`--name bitwarden -ti --net` for -ti and bottom command for uname)
OVERLORD commented 2026-02-04 16:53:49 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@mprasil commented on GitHub (Sep 26, 2018):

Ah sorry, totally missed that! Yeah, it looks like you're on aarch64 platform, but the image is built for armhf. You'll have to compile a binary for your platform unfortunately. If I'll have some free time, I might look into making aarch64 image, shouldn't be too hard hopefully.

@mprasil commented on GitHub (Sep 26, 2018): Ah sorry, totally missed that! Yeah, it looks like you're on `aarch64` platform, but the image is built for `armhf`. You'll have to compile a binary for your platform unfortunately. If I'll have some free time, I might look into making `aarch64` image, shouldn't be too hard hopefully.
OVERLORD commented 2026-02-04 16:53:54 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@mprasil commented on GitHub (Sep 28, 2018):

Hi @Proximyst, I've built aarch64 image, mprasil/bitwarden:aarch64-beta, can you test it if it works for you?

@mprasil commented on GitHub (Sep 28, 2018): Hi @Proximyst, I've built aarch64 image, `mprasil/bitwarden:aarch64-beta`, can you test it if it works for you?
OVERLORD commented 2026-02-04 16:53:57 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Proximyst commented on GitHub (Sep 28, 2018):

It boots, and I'll test it out further in a second! @mprasil

@Proximyst commented on GitHub (Sep 28, 2018): It boots, and I'll test it out further in a second! @mprasil
OVERLORD commented 2026-02-04 16:54:00 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Proximyst commented on GitHub (Sep 28, 2018):

Update: Upon trying to create an account, it just yells at me with an "Unexpected error", with no output to docker, nor in the browser console.

@Proximyst commented on GitHub (Sep 28, 2018): Update: Upon trying to create an account, it just yells at me with an "Unexpected error", with no output to docker, nor in the browser console.
OVERLORD commented 2026-02-04 16:54:05 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@mprasil commented on GitHub (Sep 28, 2018):

Hmm, can you check in developer tools on the network tab if you see any failing requests?

@mprasil commented on GitHub (Sep 28, 2018): Hmm, can you check in developer tools on the network tab if you see any failing requests?
OVERLORD commented 2026-02-04 16:54:11 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@dani-garcia commented on GitHub (Sep 28, 2018):

Are you by any chance using Chrome and HTTP only? You might need to try other browsers, we've had some problems with that case before.

@dani-garcia commented on GitHub (Sep 28, 2018): Are you by any chance using Chrome and HTTP only? You might need to try other browsers, we've had some problems with that case before.
OVERLORD commented 2026-02-04 16:54:17 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Proximyst commented on GitHub (Sep 28, 2018):

It was a badly set up NGinx configuration, actually. It works fine now. Thanks a lot for the work! <3

https://owo.whats-th.is/818809.png

@Proximyst commented on GitHub (Sep 28, 2018): It was a badly set up NGinx configuration, actually. It works fine now. Thanks a lot for the work! <3 ![https://owo.whats-th.is/818809.png](https://owo.whats-th.is/818809.png)
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
SSO
Third party
better for forum
bug
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
future Vault
future Vault
future Vault
good first issue
help wanted
low priority
notes
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
troubleshooting
wontfix
No Label enhancement
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
OVERLORD
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/vaultwarden#90
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?