Have a plan to support ECC certificates? #849

New Issue

Closed

opened 2026-02-04 23:05:42 +03:00 by OVERLORD · 3 comments

OVERLORD commented 2026-02-04 23:05:42 +03:00

Owner

Copy Link

Originally created by @Zerorigin on GitHub (Oct 29, 2020).

The same as the title. https://github.com/dani-garcia/bitwarden_rs/issues/630

Originally created by @Zerorigin on GitHub (Oct 29, 2020). The same as the title. https://github.com/dani-garcia/bitwarden_rs/issues/630

OVERLORD added the enhancementlow priorityThird party labels 2026-02-04 23:05:42 +03:00

OVERLORD closed this issue 2026-02-04 23:05:43 +03:00

OVERLORD commented 2026-02-04 23:05:47 +03:00

Author

Owner

Copy Link

@jjlin commented on GitHub (Oct 29, 2020):

This really depends on Rocket, and I don't see any indications of a plan for ECC support on that side. As noted in https://github.com/dani-garcia/bitwarden_rs/wiki/Enabling-HTTPS, using a mature reverse proxy is recommended anyway.

@jjlin commented on GitHub (Oct 29, 2020): This really depends on [Rocket](https://rocket.rs/), and I don't see any indications of a plan for ECC support on that side. As noted in https://github.com/dani-garcia/bitwarden_rs/wiki/Enabling-HTTPS, using a mature reverse proxy is recommended anyway.

OVERLORD commented 2026-02-04 23:05:48 +03:00

Author

Owner

Copy Link

@BlackDex commented on GitHub (Nov 18, 2020):

As a reference: https://github.com/SergioBenitez/Rocket/issues/1461

@BlackDex commented on GitHub (Nov 18, 2020): As a reference: https://github.com/SergioBenitez/Rocket/issues/1461

OVERLORD commented 2026-02-04 23:05:49 +03:00

Author

Owner

Copy Link

@BlackDex commented on GitHub (Dec 12, 2020):

Closing this as this is not a bitwaren_rs issue it self.
And again, we do strongly suggest to use a mature reverse proxy to handle ssl instead of bitwarden_rs it self.

@BlackDex commented on GitHub (Dec 12, 2020): Closing this as this is not a bitwaren_rs issue it self. And again, we do strongly suggest to use a mature reverse proxy to handle ssl instead of bitwarden_rs it self.

OVERLORD referenced this issue 2026-02-05 04:58:48 +03:00

[PR #960] [MERGED] Warn on empty `ADMIN_TOKEN` instead of bailing out #2813

Sign in to join this conversation.

No Branch/Tag Specified

Branches Tags

main

cached-config-operations

test_dylint

1.35.4

1.35.3

1.35.2

1.35.1

1.35.0

1.34.3

1.34.2

1.34.1

1.34.0

1.33.2

1.33.1

1.33.0

1.32.7

1.32.6

1.32.5

1.32.4

1.32.3

1.32.2

1.32.1

1.32.0

1.31.0

1.30.5

1.30.4

1.30.3

1.30.2

1.30.1

1.30.0

1.29.2

1.29.1

1.29.0

1.28.1

1.28.0

1.27.0

1.26.0

1.25.2

1.25.1

1.25.0

1.24.0

1.23.1

1.23.0

1.22.2

1.22.1

1.22.0

1.21.0

1.20.0

1.19.0

1.18.0

1.17.0

1.16.3

1.16.2

1.16.1

1.16.0

1.15.1

1.15.0

1.14.2

1.14.1

1.14

1.13.1

1.13.0

1.12.0

1.11.0

1.10.0

1.9.1

1.9.0

1.8.0

1.7.0

1.6.1

1.6.0

1.5.0

1.4.0

1.3.0

1.2.0

1.1.0

1.0.0

0.13.0

0.12.0

0.11.0

0.10.0

0.9.0

Labels

Clear labels

SSO

Third party

better for forum

bug

bug

documentation

duplicate

enhancement

future Vault

future Vault

future Vault

good first issue

help wanted

low priority

notes

pull-request

Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request

question

troubleshooting

wontfix

No Label Third party enhancement low priority

Milestone

No items

No Milestone

Projects

Clear projects

No project

Assignees

Clear assignees

OVERLORD

No Assignees

1 Participants

Notifications

Subscribe

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/vaultwarden#849