starred/vaultwarden
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden.git synced 2025-12-11 01:10:09 +03:00
Code Issues 429 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Any ETA on upgrading Web Vault to 2.10.0? #2129

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-10-09 17:46:52 +03:00 by OVERLORD · 5 comments
OVERLORD commented 2025-10-09 17:46:52 +03:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @d19dotca on GitHub.

Hello,

Was just curious is there was any ETA on issuing a recent release of Bitwarden_RS using the latest Bitwarden Web Vault version 2.10.0. Right now it seems the latest in Bitwarden_RS is 2.9.0. As somebody with a relatively large vault (about 600 items, not sure if that's really considered "large" or not), I think people like myself will benefit from the update to web vault 2.10.0 which had a release note stating "Page item listing for better performance on large vaults".

Originally created by @d19dotca on GitHub. Hello, Was just curious is there was any ETA on issuing a recent release of Bitwarden_RS using the latest Bitwarden Web Vault version 2.10.0. Right now it seems the latest in Bitwarden_RS is 2.9.0. As somebody with a relatively large vault (about 600 items, not sure if that's really considered "large" or not), I think people like myself will benefit from the update to web vault 2.10.0 which had a release note stating "Page item listing for better performance on large vaults".
OVERLORD commented 2025-10-09 17:46:54 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@dani-garcia commented on GitHub:

I'll probably get a new release going this weekend now that the new Duo integration is working fine.

@dani-garcia commented on GitHub: I'll probably get a new release going this weekend now that the new Duo integration is working fine.
OVERLORD commented 2025-10-09 17:46:54 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@d19dotca commented on GitHub:

The latest release from this repository is 1.8.0 as well.

@d19dotca commented on GitHub: The latest release from this repository is 1.8.0 as well.
OVERLORD commented 2025-10-09 17:46:55 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@d19dotca commented on GitHub:

I am running 1.8.0-alpine and it contains 2.9.0 web vault. I prefer to generally stick to versioned tags rather than using "latest" tag for production stability reasons.

@d19dotca commented on GitHub: I am running 1.8.0-alpine and it contains 2.9.0 web vault. I prefer to generally stick to versioned tags rather than using "latest" tag for production stability reasons.
OVERLORD commented 2025-10-09 17:46:58 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@dani-garcia commented on GitHub:

The new release is published now, the images will be built in a couple of hours.

@dani-garcia commented on GitHub: The new release is published now, the images will be built in a couple of hours.
OVERLORD commented 2025-10-09 17:46:59 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@mprasil commented on GitHub:

Hi @dustindauncey the mprasil/bitwarden image does have 2.10.0 version of Vault bundled in. Are you sure you're really using the latest version of the image?

@mprasil commented on GitHub: Hi @dustindauncey the `mprasil/bitwarden` image does have `2.10.0` version of Vault bundled in. Are you sure you're really using the latest version of the image?
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
better for forum
bug
bug
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
future Vault
good first issue
help wanted
low priority
notes
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
SSO
Third party
troubleshooting
troubleshooting
wontfix
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
OVERLORD
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/vaultwarden#2129
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?