starred/vaultwarden
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden.git synced 2026-02-05 00:29:40 +03:00
Code Issues 32 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

bad search results for entries with hyphens #1215

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-05 00:17:53 +03:00 by OVERLORD · 2 comments
OVERLORD commented 2026-02-05 00:17:53 +03:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @ghost on GitHub (Feb 9, 2022).

Subject of the issue

Bad search results for entries with hyphens.
It think it is a bug because there is no special treatment for hyphen or dashes in the basic search according to the documentation.

Deployment environment

  • vaultwarden version: 1.24.0
  • Install method: docker
  • Reverse proxy and version: nginx 1.20.2
  • MySQL/MariaDB or PostgreSQL version: no
  • Other relevant details: no

Steps to reproduce

  • create two entries in the database: "githubtest-pru.com" and "githubtest.com"
  • result of basic search "githubtest" is correct: the 2 entries
  • result of basic search "githubtest." is correct: 1 entry "githubtest.com"
  • result of basic search "githubtest-pru" IS INCORRECT: the 2 entries

Expected behaviour

  • result of basic search "githubtest-pru" should be 1 entry "githubtest-pru.com"

Actual behaviour

  • result of basic search "githubtest-pru" IS INCORRECT: the 2 entries
Originally created by @ghost on GitHub (Feb 9, 2022). ### Subject of the issue Bad search results for entries with hyphens. It think it is a bug because there is no special treatment for hyphen or dashes in the basic search according to the [documentation](https://bitwarden.com/help/searching-vault/#basic-search). ### Deployment environment * vaultwarden version: 1.24.0 * Install method: docker * Reverse proxy and version: nginx 1.20.2 * MySQL/MariaDB or PostgreSQL version: no * Other relevant details: no ### Steps to reproduce * create two entries in the database: "githubtest-pru.com" and "githubtest.com" * result of basic search "githubtest" is correct: the 2 entries * result of basic search "githubtest." is correct: 1 entry "githubtest.com" * result of basic search "githubtest-pru" IS INCORRECT: the 2 entries ### Expected behaviour * result of basic search "githubtest-pru" should be 1 entry "githubtest-pru.com" ### Actual behaviour * result of basic search "githubtest-pru" IS INCORRECT: the 2 entries
OVERLORD commented 2026-02-05 00:18:06 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@BlackDex commented on GitHub (Feb 9, 2022):

This is all handled from within the web-vault and nothing is done on the server endpoints for this.
So, if this is an issue, and you can reproduce this on vault.bitwarden.com i suggest to report an issue https://github.com/bitwarden/web/

@BlackDex commented on GitHub (Feb 9, 2022): This is all handled from within the web-vault and nothing is done on the server endpoints for this. So, if this is an issue, and you can reproduce this on vault.bitwarden.com i suggest to report an issue https://github.com/bitwarden/web/
OVERLORD commented 2026-02-05 00:18:10 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@ghost commented on GitHub (Feb 10, 2022):

just FYI, I reported the bug https://github.com/bitwarden/web/issues/1456

@ghost commented on GitHub (Feb 10, 2022): just FYI, I reported the bug https://github.com/bitwarden/web/issues/1456
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
SSO
Third party
better for forum
bug
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
future Vault
future Vault
future Vault
good first issue
help wanted
low priority
notes
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
troubleshooting
wontfix
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
OVERLORD
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/vaultwarden#1215
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?