starred/pocket-id-pocket-id-1
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/pocket-id/pocket-id.git synced 2025-12-11 07:42:58 +03:00
Code Issues 122 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

🚀 Feature: access rights for certain users/groups #406

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-10-08 00:07:15 +03:00 by OVERLORD · 1 comment
OVERLORD commented 2025-10-08 00:07:15 +03:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @halictuz on GitHub.

Feature description

Intro:

  • First of all. Pocket ID is great. I used Authentik for quite some time and I ditched it and now use Pocket ID only.
  • For my Homelab and selfhosted stuff Pocket ID is just so much easier and better. Authentik is really just too much for that.
  • And, Authentik is way slower with the authentication process.
  • Passkey only is actually awesome, its time to ditch passwords finally. I love it.
  • Thanks for making this cool tool/service

Feature request:

  • I am not sure if I overlooked this and it might already be implemented. Then forgive me and enlight me please.
  • Otherwise, it would be cool to have some access rights for certain users, so they can only access one site/service and not all of them with the same account.

greetings!

Pitch

Example:

  • I run Jellyfin and lots of other services behind Pocket ID/oauth2-proxy. I have people with an account on Pocket ID but I do not want them to access anything else than Jellyfin.
Originally created by @halictuz on GitHub. ### Feature description **Intro:** - First of all. Pocket ID is great. I used Authentik for quite some time and I ditched it and now use Pocket ID only. - For my Homelab and selfhosted stuff Pocket ID is just so much easier and better. Authentik is really just too much for that. - And, Authentik is way slower with the authentication process. - Passkey only is actually awesome, its time to ditch passwords finally. I love it. - Thanks for making this cool tool/service **Feature request:** - _I am not sure if I overlooked this and it might already be implemented. Then forgive me and enlight me please_. - Otherwise, it would be cool to have some access rights for certain users, so they can only access one site/service and not all of them with the same account. greetings! ### Pitch **Example:** - I run Jellyfin and lots of other services behind Pocket ID/oauth2-proxy. I have people with an account on Pocket ID but I do not want them to access anything else than Jellyfin.
OVERLORD added the feature label 2025-10-08 00:07:15 +03:00
OVERLORD commented 2025-10-08 00:07:17 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@stonith404 commented on GitHub:

Thanks for your feedback :) This feature already has been suggested, see #98. Please upvote this issue.

@stonith404 commented on GitHub: Thanks for your feedback :) This feature already has been suggested, see #98. Please upvote this issue.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
breaking
bug
documentation
feature
needs more upvotes
open to pull requests
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
No Label feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
OVERLORD
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/pocket-id-pocket-id-1#406
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?