Versions mismatch after upgrading to 10.11.0 #7481

Closed
opened 2026-02-07 05:03:47 +03:00 by OVERLORD · 10 comments
Owner

Originally created by @pgalinanes on GitHub (Oct 21, 2025).

In my dashboard the versions look like this:

Server version
10.11.0
Web Version
10.10.7
Compilation Version
10.10.7

I've tried clearing cache, re-downloading docker image, re-deploying, trying from mobile app. Still seeing that versions mismatch. How can I proceed? Thanks in advance 😄

Originally created by @pgalinanes on GitHub (Oct 21, 2025). In my dashboard the versions look like this: Server version 10.11.0 Web Version 10.10.7 Compilation Version 10.10.7 I've tried clearing cache, re-downloading docker image, re-deploying, trying from mobile app. Still seeing that versions mismatch. How can I proceed? Thanks in advance 😄
Author
Owner

@WolfganP commented on GitHub (Oct 21, 2025):

Mine as well. Raspberry Pi on Linux DietPi 6.12.47+rpt-rpi-v7 #1 SMP Raspbian :6.12.47-1+rpt1~bookworm (2025-09-16) armv7l GNU/Linux

`$ apt policy jellyfin
jellyfin:
Installed: 10.11.0+deb12
Candidate: 10.11.0+deb12

Version table:
*** 10.11.0+deb12 500
500 https://repo.jellyfin.org/debian bookworm/main armhf Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
10.10.7+deb12 500
500 https://repo.jellyfin.org/debian bookworm/main armhf Packages
10.10.6+deb12 500
500 https://repo.jellyfin.org/debian bookworm/main armhf Packages
10.9.10+deb12 500
500 https://repo.jellyfin.org/debian bookworm/main armhf Packages
`

`$ jellyfin --version

Jellyfin.Server 10.10.7.0
`

TIA for any clue

@WolfganP commented on GitHub (Oct 21, 2025): Mine as well. Raspberry Pi on `Linux DietPi 6.12.47+rpt-rpi-v7 #1 SMP Raspbian :6.12.47-1+rpt1~bookworm (2025-09-16) armv7l GNU/Linux` `$ apt policy jellyfin jellyfin: Installed: 10.11.0+deb12 Candidate: 10.11.0+deb12 Version table: *** 10.11.0+deb12 500 500 https://repo.jellyfin.org/debian bookworm/main armhf Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 10.10.7+deb12 500 500 https://repo.jellyfin.org/debian bookworm/main armhf Packages 10.10.6+deb12 500 500 https://repo.jellyfin.org/debian bookworm/main armhf Packages 10.9.10+deb12 500 500 https://repo.jellyfin.org/debian bookworm/main armhf Packages ` `$ jellyfin --version Jellyfin.Server 10.10.7.0 ` TIA for any clue
Author
Owner

@WolfganP commented on GitHub (Oct 21, 2025):

Reply to myself: ARM32/armhf platform support was removed as per https://jellyfin.org/posts/jellyfin-release-10.11.0/#removal-of-arm32-armhf-support

@WolfganP commented on GitHub (Oct 21, 2025): Reply to myself: ARM32/armhf platform support was removed as per https://jellyfin.org/posts/jellyfin-release-10.11.0/#removal-of-arm32-armhf-support
Author
Owner

@tszdabee commented on GitHub (Oct 22, 2025):

Observing the same issue, can confirm I am on ARM64 however.

Image
@tszdabee commented on GitHub (Oct 22, 2025): Observing the same issue, can confirm I am on ARM64 however. <img width="456" height="243" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2ac3649f-4aae-458b-98d3-b9404b2a6b58" />
Author
Owner

@pgalinanes commented on GitHub (Oct 22, 2025):

In my case it's AMD64, so the problem might not be related to the architecture.

@pgalinanes commented on GitHub (Oct 22, 2025): In my case it's AMD64, so the problem might not be related to the architecture.
Author
Owner

@OrangeReaper commented on GitHub (Oct 22, 2025):

I had this problem; I fixed it by refreshing my browser CTRL-F5 (I think it might be a caching issue)

@OrangeReaper commented on GitHub (Oct 22, 2025): I had this problem; I fixed it by refreshing my browser CTRL-F5 (I think it might be a caching issue)
Author
Owner

@felix920506 commented on GitHub (Oct 22, 2025):

Most likely a caching issue. Please head to our chat rooms or forum for further troubleshooting help. https:.//jellyfin.org/contact

@felix920506 commented on GitHub (Oct 22, 2025): Most likely a caching issue. Please head to our chat rooms or forum for further troubleshooting help. https:.//jellyfin.org/contact
Author
Owner

@pgalinanes commented on GitHub (Oct 22, 2025):

I've tried private browsing (so there´s no caching) and still displays different versions

@pgalinanes commented on GitHub (Oct 22, 2025): I've tried private browsing (so there´s no caching) and still displays different versions
Author
Owner

@mardocc commented on GitHub (Oct 26, 2025):

Mine ist he complete opposite:

Server-Version 10.10.7
Web-Version 10.11.0
Build-Version 10.11.0

jellyfin-ffmpeg7/unknown, now 7.1.1-2-bullseye armhf [installed, automatic]
jellyfin-server/unknown, now 10.10.7+debll armhf [installed, automatic]
jellyfin-web/unknown,now 10.11.0+debl1 all [installed, automatic]
jellyfin/unknown,now 10.11.0+deb11 all [installed]

I'm on raspberry Pi 4, raspbian 11 (bullseye) arm64
Linux raspberrypi 6.1.21-v8+ #1642 SMP PREEMPT Mon Apr 3 17:24:16 BST 2023 aarch64 GNU/Linux

Its strange when I run
uname -m = aarch64

but when I run
dpkg --print-architecture = armhf

Is it possible that I'm unable to install server 10.11.0 because my OS?

@mardocc commented on GitHub (Oct 26, 2025): Mine ist he complete opposite: Server-Version 10.10.7 Web-Version 10.11.0 Build-Version 10.11.0 jellyfin-ffmpeg7/unknown, now 7.1.1-2-bullseye armhf [installed, automatic] jellyfin-server/unknown, now 10.10.7+debll armhf [installed, automatic] jellyfin-web/unknown,now 10.11.0+debl1 all [installed, automatic] jellyfin/unknown,now 10.11.0+deb11 all [installed] I'm on raspberry Pi 4, raspbian 11 (bullseye) arm64 Linux raspberrypi 6.1.21-v8+ #1642 SMP PREEMPT Mon Apr 3 17:24:16 BST 2023 aarch64 GNU/Linux Its strange when I run uname -m = aarch64 but when I run dpkg --print-architecture = armhf Is it possible that I'm unable to install server 10.11.0 because my OS?
Author
Owner

@pgalinanes commented on GitHub (Oct 26, 2025):

In my case, the web server wasn’t updating because I had it mounted as a Docker volume, so the container didn’t refresh the files. I guess the developers didn’t plan for the web server to be mounted this way.

@pgalinanes commented on GitHub (Oct 26, 2025): In my case, the web server wasn’t updating because I had it mounted as a Docker volume, so the container didn’t refresh the files. I guess the developers didn’t plan for the web server to be mounted this way.
Author
Owner

@madneon71 commented on GitHub (Jan 8, 2026):

Running Ubuntu Server on a VM and havving the same issue. The server is running 10.11.5 but the app Onn 4k pro states its 10.10.7, I have tried all of the usual things to try...

The following packages have been kept back:
jellyfin-server
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.

@madneon71 commented on GitHub (Jan 8, 2026): Running Ubuntu Server on a VM and havving the same issue. The server is running 10.11.5 but the app Onn 4k pro states its 10.10.7, I have tried all of the usual things to try... The following packages have been kept back: jellyfin-server 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/jellyfin#7481