[Issue]: new versions RPMs are missing from all downloads #5916

Closed
opened 2026-02-07 02:38:43 +03:00 by OVERLORD · 7 comments
Owner

Originally created by @AlexCzar on GitHub (Jun 2, 2024).

Please describe your bug

10.8.13 is the last version available in the repository for either RHEL/CentOS or Fedora.

Reproduction Steps

  1. Go to https://repo.jellyfin.org/?path=/server/fedora
  2. Click on Current Stable (v10.9.4) *, Click on AMD64

expected: v10.9.* rpm packages are shown

actual: 10.8.13 rpm pacakges are shown

Jellyfin Version

10.9.0

if other:

No response

Environment

*irrelevant*

Jellyfin logs

*irrelevant*

FFmpeg logs

No response

Please attach any browser or client logs here

No response

Please attach any screenshots here

No response

Code of Conduct

  • I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct
Originally created by @AlexCzar on GitHub (Jun 2, 2024). ### Please describe your bug 10.8.13 is the last version available in the repository for either RHEL/CentOS or Fedora. ### Reproduction Steps 1. Go to https://repo.jellyfin.org/?path=/server/fedora 1. Click on [Current Stable (v10.9.4) *](https://repo.jellyfin.org/?path=/server/fedora/latest-stable), Click on [AMD64](https://repo.jellyfin.org/?path=/server/fedora/latest-stable/amd64) **expected**: v10.9.* rpm packages are shown **actual**: 10.8.13 rpm pacakges are shown ### Jellyfin Version 10.9.0 ### if other: _No response_ ### Environment ```markdown *irrelevant* ``` ### Jellyfin logs ```shell *irrelevant* ``` ### FFmpeg logs _No response_ ### Please attach any browser or client logs here _No response_ ### Please attach any screenshots here _No response_ ### Code of Conduct - [X] I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct
OVERLORD added the bug label 2026-02-07 02:38:43 +03:00
Author
Owner

@jellyfin-bot commented on GitHub (Jun 2, 2024):

Hi, it seems like your issue report has the following item(s) that need to be addressed:

  • The format of the environment section has been altered from the template.

This is an automated message, currently under testing. Please file an issue here if you encounter any problems.

@jellyfin-bot commented on GitHub (Jun 2, 2024): Hi, it seems like your issue report has the following item(s) that need to be addressed: - The format of the environment section has been altered from the template. This is an automated message, currently under testing. Please file an issue [here](https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin-triage-scripts/issues) if you encounter any problems.
Author
Owner

@crobibero commented on GitHub (Jun 2, 2024):

https://jellyfin.org/posts/new-ci-new-repo

We are dropping non-LTS Ubuntu packages, dropping our own Fedora/CentOS packages in favour of RPMFusion builds, and adding GHCR as a container repository for our Docker images.

@crobibero commented on GitHub (Jun 2, 2024): https://jellyfin.org/posts/new-ci-new-repo > We are dropping non-LTS Ubuntu packages, dropping our own Fedora/CentOS packages in favour of [RPMFusion builds](https://admin.rpmfusion.org/pkgdb/package/free/jellyfin/), and adding [GHCR as a container repository](https://ghcr.io/jellyfin/jellyfin) for our Docker images.
Author
Owner

@AlexCzar commented on GitHub (Jun 2, 2024):

https://jellyfin.org/posts/new-ci-new-repo

We are dropping non-LTS Ubuntu packages, dropping our own Fedora/CentOS packages in favour of RPMFusion builds, and adding GHCR as a container repository for our Docker images.

@crobibero That would've been OK, but 10.9.* are also not available in rpmfusion.

@AlexCzar commented on GitHub (Jun 2, 2024): > https://jellyfin.org/posts/new-ci-new-repo > > > We are dropping non-LTS Ubuntu packages, dropping our own Fedora/CentOS packages in favour of [RPMFusion builds](https://admin.rpmfusion.org/pkgdb/package/free/jellyfin/), and adding [GHCR as a container repository](https://ghcr.io/jellyfin/jellyfin) for our Docker images. @crobibero That would've been OK, but 10.9.* are also not available in rpmfusion.
Author
Owner

@kid1412621 commented on GitHub (Jul 21, 2024):

I'm confused, will there be an official RPM repo or not?

@kid1412621 commented on GitHub (Jul 21, 2024): I'm confused, will there be an official RPM repo or not?
Author
Owner

@nielsvanvelzen commented on GitHub (Jul 21, 2024):

No, we will not host our own RPM repository in an official capacity.

@nielsvanvelzen commented on GitHub (Jul 21, 2024): No, we will not host our own RPM repository in an official capacity.
Author
Owner

@kid1412621 commented on GitHub (Jul 21, 2024):

No, we will not host our own RPM repository in an official capacity.

image
so the docker version is recommended for fedora user?

@kid1412621 commented on GitHub (Jul 21, 2024): > No, we will not host our own RPM repository in an official capacity. ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8009a032-d6e1-41c2-b190-9c8678a9c11c) so the docker version is recommended for fedora user?
Author
Owner

@nielsvanvelzen commented on GitHub (Jul 21, 2024):

Docker, portable linux builds, community maintained RPM. whatever is your preference.

@nielsvanvelzen commented on GitHub (Jul 21, 2024): Docker, portable linux builds, community maintained RPM. whatever is your preference.
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/jellyfin#5916