starred/jellyfin
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin.git synced 2026-07-16 05:43:54 +03:00
Code Issues 822 Packages Projects Releases 17 Wiki Activity

[PR #14831] [MERGED] fix: add back missing behavior for HasAnyProviderId #14138

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-07 07:25:02 +03:00 by OVERLORD · 0 comments
OVERLORD commented 2026-02-07 07:25:02 +03:00
Owner
Copy Link

📋 Pull Request Information

Original PR: https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/pull/14831
Author: @revam
Created: 9/21/2025
Status: ✅ Merged
Merged: 9/22/2025
Merged by: @crobibero

Base: master ← Head: fix-has-any-provider-id-usage

📝 Commits (3)

  • dfb073e fix: add back missing behavior for HasAnyProviderId
  • 9a24143 Update Jellyfin.Server.Implementations/Item/BaseItemRepository.cs
  • 9047115 misc: add comment

📊 Changes

1 file changed (+12 additions, -2 deletions)

View changed files

📝 Jellyfin.Server.Implementations/Item/BaseItemRepository.cs (+12 -2)

📄 Description

Changes

Follow up for #14249, adding back the missing behavior to query items with any value for a provider id set.

I noticed while testing the 10.11 RC 5 that the HasAnyProviderId usage with an empty value was broken compared to 10.10, where it previously allowed you to query for all base items with the the given providers set regardless of the actual ID. Tested that it works locally.

Issues / PRs
https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/issues/14108
https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/pull/14249

🔄 This issue represents a GitHub Pull Request. It cannot be merged through Gitea due to API limitations.

## 📋 Pull Request Information **Original PR:** https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/pull/14831 **Author:** [@revam](https://github.com/revam) **Created:** 9/21/2025 **Status:** ✅ Merged **Merged:** 9/22/2025 **Merged by:** [@crobibero](https://github.com/crobibero) **Base:** `master` ← **Head:** `fix-has-any-provider-id-usage` --- ### 📝 Commits (3) - [`dfb073e`](https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/commit/dfb073e8753ebc32c56df9290ba8d8ad9047816f) fix: add back missing behavior for HasAnyProviderId - [`9a24143`](https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/commit/9a241431786a32b0f833cd4d7f6e37b9ca495bd1) Update Jellyfin.Server.Implementations/Item/BaseItemRepository.cs - [`9047115`](https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/commit/90471154b867eae77588a7fe505dd6aa0302b7b7) misc: add comment ### 📊 Changes **1 file changed** (+12 additions, -2 deletions) <details> <summary>View changed files</summary> 📝 `Jellyfin.Server.Implementations/Item/BaseItemRepository.cs` (+12 -2) </details> ### 📄 Description **Changes** Follow up for #14249, adding back the missing behavior to query items with any value for a provider id set. I noticed while testing the 10.11 RC 5 that the `HasAnyProviderId` usage with an empty value was broken compared to 10.10, where it previously allowed you to query for all base items with the the given providers set regardless of the actual ID. Tested that it works locally. **Issues / PRs** https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/issues/14108 https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/pull/14249 --- <sub>🔄 This issue represents a GitHub Pull Request. It cannot be merged through Gitea due to API limitations.</sub>
OVERLORD added the pull-request label 2026-02-07 07:25:02 +03:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
EFjellyfin.db
area:database
awaiting-feedback
backend
blocked
breaking change: web api
bug
build
ci
confirmed
discussion needed
dotnet future
downstream
duplicate
enhancement
feature
future
github-actions
good first issue
hdr
help wanted
invalid
investigation
librarydb
live-tv
lyrics
media playback
music
needs testing
nuget
performance
platform
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
regression
release critical
requires-web
roadmap
security
security
stale
support
syncplay
ui & ux
upstream
wontfix
No Label pull-request
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
OVERLORD
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/jellyfin#14138
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?