starred/ProxmoxVE
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/community-scripts/ProxmoxVE.git synced 2026-02-05 00:29:55 +03:00
Code Issues 11 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Help Wanted: Figlet alternative / native header in shell #276

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-04 17:38:39 +03:00 by OVERLORD · 6 comments
OVERLORD commented 2026-02-04 17:38:39 +03:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @MickLesk on GitHub (Jan 4, 2025).

Help Wanted:

Searching an Alternative for Figlet Header Generation:

Goals:

  1. replacement of Figlet/Toilet
  2. clean header area

Solution:

  • Feel free to make suggestions
  • If possible without dependencies, must work on debian/ubuntu & ultimately also on alpine.
  • Must work for all script lengths, e.g. “memos” or also “Homeassistant-Core”

Idea:

  • Native script (like to upload or create a repo yourself), which we can implement in the build.func that the ASCII header is built dynamically without third-party software.
Originally created by @MickLesk on GitHub (Jan 4, 2025). ### Help Wanted: **Searching an Alternative for Figlet Header Generation:** Goals: 1. replacement of Figlet/Toilet 2. clean header area Solution: - Feel free to make suggestions - If possible without dependencies, must work on debian/ubuntu & ultimately also on alpine. - Must work for all script lengths, e.g. “memos” or also “Homeassistant-Core” Idea: - Native script (like to upload or create a repo yourself), which we can implement in the build.func that the ASCII header is built dynamically without third-party software.
OVERLORD added the maintenancehelp wanteddependencies labels 2026-02-04 17:38:39 +03:00
OVERLORD commented 2026-02-04 17:38:45 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@michelroegl-brunner commented on GitHub (Jan 4, 2025):

I'm actually trying to port/implement something in bash atm. Will be a few more days tough.

@michelroegl-brunner commented on GitHub (Jan 4, 2025): I'm actually trying to port/implement something in bash atm. Will be a few more days tough.
OVERLORD commented 2026-02-04 17:38:51 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@burgerga commented on GitHub (Jan 5, 2025):

You could do it with a Github action that automatically creates/update the ASCII headers in a directory in the github repo for every script.

Benefits:

  • No dependencies in the LXC/VM
  • Efficient: only generated once (or when updated)
  • No need to reinvent the wheel
@burgerga commented on GitHub (Jan 5, 2025): You could do it with a Github action that automatically creates/update the ASCII headers in a directory in the github repo for every script. Benefits: - No dependencies in the LXC/VM - Efficient: only generated once (or when updated) - No need to reinvent the wheel
OVERLORD commented 2026-02-04 17:38:59 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@MickLesk commented on GitHub (Jan 5, 2025):

Can you create an Example Branch for Testing? Im not a pro with GH Actions 😅

@MickLesk commented on GitHub (Jan 5, 2025): Can you create an Example Branch for Testing? Im not a pro with GH Actions 😅
OVERLORD commented 2026-02-04 17:39:07 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@towerhand commented on GitHub (Jan 5, 2025):

What I had in mind is having a static ASCII header displaying "Proxmox VE Helper-Scripts" and a couple of lines with the relevant information for the repo. Then, a variable line with the name of the application. Keep it simple.

@towerhand commented on GitHub (Jan 5, 2025): What I had in mind is having a static ASCII header displaying "Proxmox VE Helper-Scripts" and a couple of lines with the relevant information for the repo. Then, a variable line with the name of the application. Keep it simple.
OVERLORD commented 2026-02-04 17:39:24 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@burgerga commented on GitHub (Jan 6, 2025):

@MickLesk Yes, it will take a bit of time though with the after-holidays catch up :)

@burgerga commented on GitHub (Jan 6, 2025): @MickLesk Yes, it will take a bit of time though with the after-holidays catch up :)
OVERLORD commented 2026-02-04 17:39:37 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@burgerga commented on GitHub (Jan 13, 2025):

Ah I see you already wrote a GHA, nice! I thought about creating a separate file for each APP but this approach saves you the trouble of figuring out that logic, because the computational cost is likely negligible :)

@burgerga commented on GitHub (Jan 13, 2025): Ah I see you already wrote a GHA, nice! I thought about creating a separate file for each APP but this approach saves you the trouble of figuring out that logic, because the computational cost is likely negligible :)
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
Implemented in VED waiting push to Main
breaking change
bug
bug
bugfix
deferred
delete script
dependencies
enhancement
external
feature
github
help wanted
in project pipeline
invalid
investigation
json
maintenance
needs triage
new script
new script
nice to have
not a script issue
not planned
organization
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
refactor
rename script
security
update script
website
wontdo
🛑 Failure to comply with the guidelines
No Label dependencies help wanted maintenance
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
OVERLORD
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/ProxmoxVE#276
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?