mirror of
https://github.com/BookStackApp/BookStack.git
synced 2026-02-13 11:19:37 +03:00
ldap port 389 add possibility to change port #5476
Open
opened 2026-02-05 10:05:44 +03:00 by OVERLORD
·
5 comments
No Branch/Tag Specified
development
l10n_development
release
v25-12
llm_only
vectors
v25-11
docker_env
drawio_rendering
user_permissions
ldap_host_failover
svg_image
prosemirror
captcha_example
fix/video-export
v25.12.3
v25.12.2
v25.12.1
v25.12
v25.11.6
v25.11.5
v25.11.4
v24.11.4
v25.11.3
v25.11.2
v25.11.1
v25.11
v25.07.3
v25.07.2
v25.07.1
v25.07
v25.05.2
v25.05.1
v25.05
v25.02.5
v25.02.4
v25.02.3
v25.02.2
v25.02.1
v25.02
v24.12.1
v24.12
v24.10.3
v24.10.2
v24.10.1
v24.10
v24.05.4
v24.05.3
v24.05.2
v24.05.1
v24.05
v24.02.3
v24.02.2
v24.02.1
v24.02
v23.12.3
v23.12.2
v23.12.1
v23.12
v23.10.4
v23.10.3
v23.10.2
v23.10.1
v23.10
v23.08.3
v23.08.2
v23.08.1
v23.08
v23.06.2
v23.06.1
v23.06
v23.05.2
v23.05.1
v23.05
v23.02.3
v23.02.2
v23.02.1
v23.02
v23.01.1
v23.01
v22.11.1
v22.11
v22.10.2
v22.10.1
v22.10
v22.09.1
v22.09
v22.07.3
v22.07.2
v22.07.1
v22.07
v22.06.2
v22.06.1
v22.06
v22.04.2
v22.04.1
v22.04
v22.03.1
v22.03
v22.02.3
v22.02.2
v22.02.1
v22.02
v21.12.5
v21.12.4
v21.12.3
v21.12.2
v21.12.1
v21.12
v21.11.3
v21.11.2
v21.11.1
v21.11
v21.10.3
v21.10.2
v21.10.1
v21.10
v21.08.6
v21.08.5
v21.08.4
v21.08.3
v21.08.2
v21.08.1
v21.08
v21.05.4
v21.05.3
v21.05.2
v21.05.1
v21.05
v21.04.6
v21.04.5
v21.04.4
v21.04.3
v21.04.2
v21.04.1
v21.04
v0.31.8
v0.31.7
v0.31.6
v0.31.5
v0.31.4
v0.31.3
v0.31.2
v0.31.1
v0.31.0
v0.30.7
v0.30.6
v0.30.5
v0.30.4
v0.30.3
v0.30.2
v0.30.1
v0.30.0
v0.29.3
v0.29.2
v0.29.1
v0.29.0
v0.28.3
v0.28.2
v0.28.1
v0.28.0
v0.27.5
v0.27.4
v0.27.3
v0.27.2
v0.27.1
v0.27
v0.26.4
v0.26.3
v0.26.2
v0.26.1
v0.26.0
v0.25.5
v0.25.4
v0.25.3
v0.25.2
v0.25.1
v0.25.0
v0.24.3
v0.24.2
v0.24.1
v0.24.0
v0.23.2
v0.23.1
v0.23.0
v0.22.0
v0.21.0
v0.20.3
v0.20.2
v0.20.1
v0.20.0
v0.19.0
v0.18.5
v0.18.4
v0.18.3
v0.18.2
v0.18.1
v0.18.0
v0.17.4
v0.17.3
v0.17.2
v0.17.1
v0.17.0
v0.16.3
v0.16.2
v0.16.1
v0.16.0
v0.15.3
v0.15.2
v0.15.1
v0.15.0
v0.14.3
v0.14.2
v0.14.1
v0.14.0
v0.13.1
v0.13.0
v0.12.2
v0.12.1
v0.12.0
v0.11.2
v0.11.1
v0.11.0
v0.10.0
v0.9.3
v0.9.2
v0.9.1
v0.9.0
v0.8.2
v0.8.1
v0.8.0
v0.7.6
v0.7.5
v0.7.4
v0.7.3
0.7.2
v.0.7.1
v0.7.0
v0.6.3
v0.6.2
v0.6.1
v0.6.0
v0.5.0
Labels
Clear labels
🎨 Design
📖 Docs Update
🐛 Bug
🐛 Bug
:cat2:🐈 Possible duplicate
💿 Database
☕ Open to discussion
💻 Front-End
🐕 Support
🚪 Authentication
🌍 Translations
🔌 API Task
🏭 Back-End
⛲ Upstream
🔨 Feature Request
🛠️ Enhancement
🛠️ Enhancement
🛠️ Enhancement
❤️ Happy feedback
🔒 Security
🔍 Pending Validation
💆 UX
📝 WYSIWYG Editor
🌔 Out of scope
🔩 API Request
:octocat: Admin/Meta
🖌️ View Customization
❓ Question
🚀 Priority
🛡️ Blocked
🚚 Export System
♿ A11y
🔧 Maintenance
> Markdown Editor
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
No Label
🐕 Support
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: starred/BookStack#5476
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @liviodaina on GitHub (Oct 30, 2025).
Describe the feature you'd like
i've configured bookstack with ad auth on port 389 and all works fine.
we have installed for enabling ldap with 2fa a software for proxing ldap effective AD servers, so in this schema:
(LDAP PROXY listen on 10389) -> (LDAP EFFECTIVE: 389)
in this scenario LDAP PROXY ask for username and accept 2fa code only without password as LDAP PROXY is connected to LDAP:389
in this way we have addedd 2fa function to standard ldap call.
if for example i run to test the response with ldapsearch the results are the same:
"
ldapsearch -x -b "dc=domain,dc=com" -H ldap://000.000.000.000:389 -D "cn=user1,cn=Users,dc=domain,dc=com" -W
ldapsearch -x -b "dc=domain,dc=com" -H ldap://111.111.111.11:10389 -D "cn=user1,cn=Users,dc=domain,dc=com" -W
"
if i will have the possibility to change port 389 on .env configuration i think is a good option
Describe the benefits this would bring to existing BookStack users
the benefit is that bookstack service can have 2fa or a layer of security or the overall benefit regarding that bookstack server/services doens not contact ldap server directly
Can the goal of this request already be achieved via other means?
yes, you can have multiple ldap connection using ldap proxy with only one connection, you can have 2fa feature without "touch" your ad environment
Have you searched for an existing open/closed issue?
How long have you been using BookStack?
Not using yet, just scoping
Additional context
No response
@ssddanbrown commented on GitHub (Oct 31, 2025):
Hi @liviodaina,
You can define a port as part of the
LDAP_SERVERoption as detailed in our documentation:So in your second command example case:
@liviodaina commented on GitHub (Oct 31, 2025):
Hi, first of all thanks for your reply.
sorry if i'm wrong as i've specified in that forms as you LDAP_SERVER=111.111.111.11:10389 but the response was that the server could not be contacted in 389 port.
as told before the response from the server where is bookstack the command ldapsearch is fine, so i think that the function that receive the ldap host will use 389 or 636 in case of ldaps, ignoring the port specified.
regards, livio
@ssddanbrown commented on GitHub (Oct 31, 2025):
@liviodaina How are you running BookStack? How did you originally install BookStack?
@liviodaina commented on GitHub (Oct 31, 2025):
oh yes, i've installed and im using in order to try if will be useful for us in order to take documents management of IT infrastructure, backup infrastructure, howto deploy software, faq dedicated to user, and so on. Im' trying to undestand if will be better to have stand alone service or integrated with our infrastructure, the question is if it's better to integrate, but, just consider that in case of problem you may dont have your infrastructure and you need docs that explain you how you have organized the it ? (for example)
@ssddanbrown commented on GitHub (Oct 31, 2025):
@liviodaina I mean more in the technical sense of use/install. are you using docker? Or did you install using one of our scripts?
It sounds like config/setting changes you're making are not being picked up hence I'm trying to understand your technical environment a little better.