Excalidraw on Bookstack #5021

Closed
opened 2026-02-05 09:34:11 +03:00 by OVERLORD · 1 comment
Owner

Originally created by @reddexx on GitHub (Oct 24, 2024).

Describe the feature you'd like

is it possible to add Excalidraw to the new text editor?
The function exists in Lexical (see picture)

image

Describe the benefits this would bring to existing BookStack users

alternative to Drawio

Can the goal of this request already be achieved via other means?

over extra Excalidraw instance

Have you searched for an existing open/closed issue?

  • I have searched for existing issues and none cover my fundamental request

How long have you been using BookStack?

Not using yet, just scoping

Additional context

No response

Originally created by @reddexx on GitHub (Oct 24, 2024). ### Describe the feature you'd like is it possible to add Excalidraw to the new text editor? The function exists in Lexical (see picture) ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a649f134-f3e5-4fac-9511-d7f9126e7767) ### Describe the benefits this would bring to existing BookStack users alternative to Drawio ### Can the goal of this request already be achieved via other means? over extra Excalidraw instance ### Have you searched for an existing open/closed issue? - [X] I have searched for existing issues and none cover my fundamental request ### How long have you been using BookStack? Not using yet, just scoping ### Additional context _No response_
OVERLORD added the 🔨 Feature Request:cat2:🐈 Possible duplicate labels 2026-02-05 09:34:11 +03:00
Author
Owner

@ssddanbrown commented on GitHub (Oct 24, 2024):

Thanks for the suggestion @reddexx, but this has been discussed before in #4053 so I'm going to therefore close this off.
I wouldn't look to add support just for being an alternative.

Also, the features shown in the lexical playground are often specific to their playground code, they are not part of the core lexical library, and even then the editor is just one fact of support for something like this.

@ssddanbrown commented on GitHub (Oct 24, 2024): Thanks for the suggestion @reddexx, but this has been discussed before in #4053 so I'm going to therefore close this off. I wouldn't look to add support just for being an alternative. Also, the features shown in the lexical playground are often specific to their playground code, they are not part of the core lexical library, and even then the editor is just one fact of support for something like this.
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/BookStack#5021