mirror of
https://github.com/BookStackApp/BookStack.git
synced 2026-02-05 00:29:48 +03:00
Should social accounts auto-link on email address? #408
Closed
opened 2026-02-04 19:40:11 +03:00 by OVERLORD
·
6 comments
No Branch/Tag Specified
development
l10n_development
further_theme_development
release
llm_only
vectors
v25-11
docker_env
drawio_rendering
user_permissions
ldap_host_failover
svg_image
prosemirror
captcha_example
fix/video-export
v25.12.3
v25.12.2
v25.12.1
v25.12
v25.11.6
v25.11.5
v25.11.4
v24.11.4
v25.11.3
v25.11.2
v25.11.1
v25.11
v25.07.3
v25.07.2
v25.07.1
v25.07
v25.05.2
v25.05.1
v25.05
v25.02.5
v25.02.4
v25.02.3
v25.02.2
v25.02.1
v25.02
v24.12.1
v24.12
v24.10.3
v24.10.2
v24.10.1
v24.10
v24.05.4
v24.05.3
v24.05.2
v24.05.1
v24.05
v24.02.3
v24.02.2
v24.02.1
v24.02
v23.12.3
v23.12.2
v23.12.1
v23.12
v23.10.4
v23.10.3
v23.10.2
v23.10.1
v23.10
v23.08.3
v23.08.2
v23.08.1
v23.08
v23.06.2
v23.06.1
v23.06
v23.05.2
v23.05.1
v23.05
v23.02.3
v23.02.2
v23.02.1
v23.02
v23.01.1
v23.01
v22.11.1
v22.11
v22.10.2
v22.10.1
v22.10
v22.09.1
v22.09
v22.07.3
v22.07.2
v22.07.1
v22.07
v22.06.2
v22.06.1
v22.06
v22.04.2
v22.04.1
v22.04
v22.03.1
v22.03
v22.02.3
v22.02.2
v22.02.1
v22.02
v21.12.5
v21.12.4
v21.12.3
v21.12.2
v21.12.1
v21.12
v21.11.3
v21.11.2
v21.11.1
v21.11
v21.10.3
v21.10.2
v21.10.1
v21.10
v21.08.6
v21.08.5
v21.08.4
v21.08.3
v21.08.2
v21.08.1
v21.08
v21.05.4
v21.05.3
v21.05.2
v21.05.1
v21.05
v21.04.6
v21.04.5
v21.04.4
v21.04.3
v21.04.2
v21.04.1
v21.04
v0.31.8
v0.31.7
v0.31.6
v0.31.5
v0.31.4
v0.31.3
v0.31.2
v0.31.1
v0.31.0
v0.30.7
v0.30.6
v0.30.5
v0.30.4
v0.30.3
v0.30.2
v0.30.1
v0.30.0
v0.29.3
v0.29.2
v0.29.1
v0.29.0
v0.28.3
v0.28.2
v0.28.1
v0.28.0
v0.27.5
v0.27.4
v0.27.3
v0.27.2
v0.27.1
v0.27
v0.26.4
v0.26.3
v0.26.2
v0.26.1
v0.26.0
v0.25.5
v0.25.4
v0.25.3
v0.25.2
v0.25.1
v0.25.0
v0.24.3
v0.24.2
v0.24.1
v0.24.0
v0.23.2
v0.23.1
v0.23.0
v0.22.0
v0.21.0
v0.20.3
v0.20.2
v0.20.1
v0.20.0
v0.19.0
v0.18.5
v0.18.4
v0.18.3
v0.18.2
v0.18.1
v0.18.0
v0.17.4
v0.17.3
v0.17.2
v0.17.1
v0.17.0
v0.16.3
v0.16.2
v0.16.1
v0.16.0
v0.15.3
v0.15.2
v0.15.1
v0.15.0
v0.14.3
v0.14.2
v0.14.1
v0.14.0
v0.13.1
v0.13.0
v0.12.2
v0.12.1
v0.12.0
v0.11.2
v0.11.1
v0.11.0
v0.10.0
v0.9.3
v0.9.2
v0.9.1
v0.9.0
v0.8.2
v0.8.1
v0.8.0
v0.7.6
v0.7.5
v0.7.4
v0.7.3
0.7.2
v.0.7.1
v0.7.0
v0.6.3
v0.6.2
v0.6.1
v0.6.0
v0.5.0
Labels
Clear labels
🎨 Design
📖 Docs Update
🐛 Bug
🐛 Bug
:cat2:🐈 Possible duplicate
💿 Database
☕ Open to discussion
💻 Front-End
🐕 Support
🚪 Authentication
🌍 Translations
🔌 API Task
🏭 Back-End
⛲ Upstream
🔨 Feature Request
🛠️ Enhancement
🛠️ Enhancement
🛠️ Enhancement
❤️ Happy feedback
🔒 Security
🔍 Pending Validation
💆 UX
📝 WYSIWYG Editor
🌔 Out of scope
🔩 API Request
:octocat: Admin/Meta
🖌️ View Customization
❓ Question
🚀 Priority
🛡️ Blocked
🚚 Export System
♿ A11y
🔧 Maintenance
> Markdown Editor
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: starred/BookStack#408
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @ssddanbrown on GitHub (Aug 17, 2017).
Currently when logging in with a social account it will only allow login if the account is linked to a user. If a matching email is found it will not auto-link based on email address but advise the user should link their account in settings.
Similarly, When registering via a social account it will display an error if the user already exists and they're required to log in to link their account.
It would be a nicer user experience to simply always link on email address if possible.
Just wondering if anyone has any thoughts on the security of linking based on email address?
Really I suppose it comes down to the security of the oAuth service but if it's trusted for new registrations it might as well be trusted for linking to existing contacts?
@ssddanbrown commented on GitHub (Aug 17, 2017):
Additional thought, By doing this some of the social auth code could be cleaned up quite a bit since the registration/login actions could essentially have the same logic.
@jkueh commented on GitHub (Aug 18, 2017):
My current thinking is that it could be circumvented by updating a random account on the OAuth provider side to the desired email address, and if that email address (despite it's pending verification status on the provider end), is passed to Bookstack, could be used to gain entry if auto-linking is enabled.
That being said, what I would like is the option to auto-create and auto-link for Google users that are in a specified G Suite organisation, as well as memberships based on G Suite groups so the user is just presented with a 'Log in with Google' button that works regardless of whether they've visited it before 🙃
@ffub commented on GitHub (May 18, 2018):
I would also like to see this behaviour and a registration/login flow as described by @jordankueh. Combined with "remember me" working for social logins (#847), all the users of a linked domain would have to do is click "Log in with Google", once, to log in securely. The first time would require them to confirm their email address.
@ibrahimennafaa commented on GitHub (Aug 15, 2018):
@ffub why confirming the email address is required when the email was already verified by Google? I think the email verification should be skipped for users authenticating with Google. i.e. you cannot use someone else's email to login with Google so there is no need to verify the identity (that was the purpose of the Google Auth).
Does it make sense?
Do you guys have an update on these automatic signup features for social login? That is a blocker on my side to fully use the tool.
@ibrahimennafaa commented on GitHub (Aug 17, 2018):
Attempt of PR here #966
Let me know what you think :)
@ssddanbrown commented on GitHub (Sep 21, 2018):
This flow is now optionally possible as described here: https://github.com/BookStackApp/BookStack/pull/966#issuecomment-423610250
Therefore I'll now close this.