[Feature Request]: Ability to add tables side-by-side #2591

New Issue

OVERLORD · 2026-02-05T04:34:44+03:00

OVERLORD commented

2026-02-05 04:34:44 +03:00

Originally created by @patsyk1 on GitHub (Jan 21, 2022).

Describe the feature you'd like

Apologies if this is a feature and I've just not figured it out, but please could we get the ability to add tables side by side in a page? Similar to how we can have pictures side by side.

Describe the benefits this feature would bring to BookStack users

It would save a lot of page space/scrolling for pages that contain numerous tables of information. Especially if said tables are only 2/3 columns at best.

Additional context

No response

Originally created by @patsyk1 on GitHub (Jan 21, 2022). ### Describe the feature you'd like Apologies if this is a feature and I've just not figured it out, but please could we get the ability to add tables side by side in a page? Similar to how we can have pictures side by side. ### Describe the benefits this feature would bring to BookStack users It would save a lot of page space/scrolling for pages that contain numerous tables of information. Especially if said tables are only 2/3 columns at best. ### Additional context _No response_

OVERLORD added the 🔨 Feature Request label 2026-02-05 04:34:44 +03:00

OVERLORD closed this issue

2026-02-05 04:34:45 +03:00

OVERLORD commented

2026-02-05 04:34:49 +03:00

@ssddanbrown commented on GitHub (Oct 3, 2022):

Thanks for the suggestion @patsyk1, but I'm going to close this off for the following reasons:

There has been little additional demand for this feature.
Tables are already limited in flexibility, which allowing use within more complex layouts would only exacerbate.
I'd prefer not to complicate the core content layout capabilities where possible, to keep content as portable where possible.

@ssddanbrown commented on GitHub (Oct 3, 2022): Thanks for the suggestion @patsyk1, but I'm going to close this off for the following reasons: - There has been little additional demand for this feature. - Tables are already limited in flexibility, which allowing use within more complex layouts would only exacerbate. - I'd prefer not to complicate the core content layout capabilities where possible, to keep content as portable where possible.

OVERLORD referenced this issue

2026-02-05 10:22:51 +03:00

[PR #2591] [MERGED] Adding APP_VIEWS_BOOKSHELF to .ENV #6022

Sign in to join this conversation.

Branches Tags

development

l10n_development

release

v26-03

ci_fixing

codeberg-actions

lexical_may_2026

MilnerMart/development

sort_rule_text

GamerClassN7/impersonations-for-admin

Zhey-on/feature/csp-image-css-controls-6033

tortillas5/development

clauvaldez/mfaReset

llm_only

vectors

McTom234/oidc-key-algorithms

docker_env

drawio_rendering

user_permissions

ldap_host_failover

svg_image

prosemirror

captcha_example

fix/video-export

1 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/BookStack#2591