Markdown wraps words in table with long columns #2179

Open
opened 2026-02-05 03:12:55 +03:00 by OVERLORD · 2 comments
Owner

Originally created by @nycterent on GitHub (Mar 31, 2021).

Source markdown:

image

Preview:

image

Result:

image

So you can see - the result has split words, which is unexpected for markdown, I would expect the same result as in Preview

Originally created by @nycterent on GitHub (Mar 31, 2021). Source markdown: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/81133/113136968-a470bc00-922c-11eb-9f37-60c3c891e09f.png) Preview: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/81133/113137036-b3f00500-922c-11eb-95a1-e3233c89c5e4.png) Result: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/81133/113137073-bd796d00-922c-11eb-84d0-e54e6ab2de5e.png) So you can see - the result has split words, which is unexpected for markdown, I would expect the same result as in Preview
OVERLORD added the 🐛 Bug🎨 Design💻 Front-End labels 2026-02-05 03:12:55 +03:00
Author
Owner

@ssddanbrown commented on GitHub (Mar 31, 2021):

Thanks for raising @nycterent.

The final display is really dependent on the styling rules of the table on the page, I don't think there's really any expectations of the behavior for markdown itself.

I'll keep this open with the resolution being aligning the behavior across the preview and end-result, But it might be the case we standardise on the shown result rather than the preview.

For these kind of details, such as long keys you'll need to copy, reformatting the structure to use a code block may suit your needs better.

@ssddanbrown commented on GitHub (Mar 31, 2021): Thanks for raising @nycterent. The final display is really dependent on the styling rules of the table on the page, I don't think there's really any expectations of the behavior for markdown itself. I'll keep this open with the resolution being aligning the behavior across the preview and end-result, But it might be the case we standardise on the shown result rather than the preview. For these kind of details, such as long keys you'll need to copy, reformatting the structure to use a code block may suit your needs better.
Author
Owner

@nycterent commented on GitHub (Mar 31, 2021):

probably i am doing something wrong, but using ` or ``` does not solve the
problem - the words are still split

On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 at 15:45, Dan Brown @.***> wrote:

Thanks for raising @nycterent https://github.com/nycterent.

The final display is really dependent on the styling rules of the table on
the page, I don't think there's really any expectations of the behavior for
markdown itself.

I'll keep this open with the resolution being aligning the behavior across
the preview and end-result, But it might be the case we standardise on the
shown result rather than the preview.

For these kind of details, such as long keys you'll need to copy,
reformatting the structure to use a code block may suit your needs better.


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/BookStackApp/BookStack/issues/2663#issuecomment-811039349,
or unsubscribe
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAATZ3LV7G2CMWWUXIYMXCDTGMKPFANCNFSM42ENCCEA
.

@nycterent commented on GitHub (Mar 31, 2021): probably i am doing something wrong, but using ` or ``` does not solve the problem - the words are still split On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 at 15:45, Dan Brown ***@***.***> wrote: > Thanks for raising @nycterent <https://github.com/nycterent>. > > The final display is really dependent on the styling rules of the table on > the page, I don't think there's really any expectations of the behavior for > markdown itself. > > I'll keep this open with the resolution being aligning the behavior across > the preview and end-result, But it might be the case we standardise on the > shown result rather than the preview. > > For these kind of details, such as long keys you'll need to copy, > reformatting the structure to use a code block may suit your needs better. > > — > You are receiving this because you were mentioned. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/BookStackApp/BookStack/issues/2663#issuecomment-811039349>, > or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAATZ3LV7G2CMWWUXIYMXCDTGMKPFANCNFSM42ENCCEA> > . >
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/BookStack#2179