starred/BookStack
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/BookStackApp/BookStack.git synced 2026-05-04 18:08:46 +03:00
Code Issues 784 Packages Projects Releases 15 Wiki Activity

[Feature Request] Microsoft SQL Integration #1943

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-05 02:16:30 +03:00 by OVERLORD · 1 comment
OVERLORD commented 2026-02-05 02:16:30 +03:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @athornfam2 on GitHub (Nov 16, 2020).

Describe the feature you'd like
I'm requesting that the developers look into bringing Microsoft SQL integrations as an option for Bookstack

Describe the benefits this feature would bring to BookStack users
For those that own and operate either a SQL Developer or Production environment will have a lot of benefits. Personally for me, I would rather not have multiple databases under multiple different open-sourced products. Open Source is great but for me and some others that use SQL at home and Work it would be nice to integrate this program into that as an additional database.

Originally created by @athornfam2 on GitHub (Nov 16, 2020). **Describe the feature you'd like** I'm requesting that the developers look into bringing Microsoft SQL integrations as an option for Bookstack **Describe the benefits this feature would bring to BookStack users** For those that own and operate either a SQL Developer or Production environment will have a lot of benefits. Personally for me, I would rather not have multiple databases under multiple different open-sourced products. Open Source is great but for me and some others that use SQL at home and Work it would be nice to integrate this program into that as an additional database.
OVERLORD added the 🌔 Out of scope label 2026-02-05 02:16:30 +03:00
OVERLORD commented 2026-02-05 02:16:36 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@ssddanbrown commented on GitHub (Nov 18, 2020):

Thanks for the request @athornfam2.

Unfortunately I'm going to close this off as out of scope, at least at this time.
Over the past 5 years we have had some requests for SQLite and Postgres but MSSQL support has been little requests so I'm fairly confident it won't be worth the implementation and maintenance, especially for a database that is fairly (Although lesser so nowadays) platform dependant.

My thoughts on additional database support in general can be seen here:
https://github.com/BookStackApp/BookStack/issues/76#issuecomment-494956958

@ssddanbrown commented on GitHub (Nov 18, 2020): Thanks for the request @athornfam2. Unfortunately I'm going to close this off as out of scope, at least at this time. Over the past 5 years we have had some requests for SQLite and Postgres but MSSQL support has been little requests so I'm fairly confident it won't be worth the implementation and maintenance, especially for a database that is fairly (Although lesser so nowadays) platform dependant. My thoughts on additional database support in general can be seen here: https://github.com/BookStackApp/BookStack/issues/76#issuecomment-494956958
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
🎨 Design
📖 Docs Update
🐛 Bug
🐛 Bug
:cat2:🐈 Possible duplicate
💿 Database
☕ Open to discussion
💻 Front-End
🐕 Support
🚪 Authentication
🌍 Translations
🔌 API Task
🏭 Back-End
⛲ Upstream
🔨 Feature Request
🛠️ Enhancement
🛠️ Enhancement
🛠️ Enhancement
❤️ Happy feedback
🔒 Security
🔍 Pending Validation
💆 UX
📝 WYSIWYG Editor
🌔 Out of scope
🔩 API Request
:octocat: Admin/Meta
🖌️ View Customization
❓ Question
🚀 Priority
🛡️ Blocked
🚚 Export System
♿ A11y
🔧 Maintenance
> Markdown Editor
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
No Label 🌔 Out of scope
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
OVERLORD
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/BookStack#1943
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?