“Sharing on <dd. mm. jjjj> by <first name Last Name>" and “Checked on <dd. mm. jjjj> by <first name Last Name>" #1940

Closed
opened 2026-02-05 02:16:15 +03:00 by OVERLORD · 2 comments
Owner

Originally created by @linux-lukas on GitHub (Nov 15, 2020).

Describe the feature you'd like

In BookStack I would still like to have the possibility of approval and examination. Then you could use BookStack as a productive environment in the school context.

Describe the benefits this feature would bring to BookStack users

A student creates an hourly log in BookStack. Then the student draws up the protocol – it could be checked and released by the specialist teacher after he was able to assess it professionally.

Additional context

Originally created by @linux-lukas on GitHub (Nov 15, 2020). **Describe the feature you'd like** In BookStack I would still like to have the possibility of approval and examination. Then you could use BookStack as a productive environment in the school context. **Describe the benefits this feature would bring to BookStack users** A student creates an hourly log in BookStack. Then the student draws up the protocol – it could be checked and released by the specialist teacher after he was able to assess it professionally. **Additional context**
OVERLORD added the :cat2:🐈 Possible duplicate label 2026-02-05 02:16:15 +03:00
Author
Owner

@ssddanbrown commented on GitHub (Nov 18, 2020):

Thanks for the request @MorpheusSohn,

BookStack is not primarily intended for an education environment, so I wouldn't really look to implement any education specific features or have education-specific workflows being a primary driver for a new feature.

I could see how a general approval/review flow may benefit BookStack users in general though.
There are some existing features related to an approval/review flow: #2123 and #473.
Therefore I'm going to close this off as a duplicate.

@ssddanbrown commented on GitHub (Nov 18, 2020): Thanks for the request @MorpheusSohn, BookStack is not primarily intended for an education environment, so I wouldn't really look to implement any education specific features or have education-specific workflows being a primary driver for a new feature. I could see how a general approval/review flow may benefit BookStack users in general though. There are some existing features related to an approval/review flow: #2123 and #473. Therefore I'm going to close this off as a duplicate.
Author
Owner

@linux-lukas commented on GitHub (Nov 18, 2020):

@ssddanbrown The use in educational institutions was just one example - with this option BookStack would have features of a quality management system (QMS), which I would if there were, for example, an export to and an import from .odt and .md files. Since I'm unfortunately not that good at programming, I don't know to what extent it would be feasible.

@linux-lukas commented on GitHub (Nov 18, 2020): @ssddanbrown The use in educational institutions was just one example - with this option BookStack would have features of a quality management system (QMS), which I would if there were, for example, an export to and an import from .odt and .md files. Since I'm unfortunately not that good at programming, I don't know to what extent it would be feasible.
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/BookStack#1940