immich-app/immich
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/immich-app/immich.git synced 2026-07-25 14:00:45 +03:00
Code Issues 783 Packages Projects Releases 22 Wiki Activity

Search results are not sorted, should be newest first #4080

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-05 09:42:26 +03:00 by OVERLORD · 6 comments
OVERLORD commented 2026-02-05 09:42:26 +03:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @JordyEGNL on GitHub (Aug 15, 2024).

The bug

The search results are not sorted. In my opinion they should be sorted by newest first.

The OS that Immich Server is running on

NA

Version of Immich Server

v1.112.0

Version of Immich Mobile App

v1.112.0

Platform with the issue

  • Server
  • Web
  • Mobile

Your docker-compose.yml content

NA

Your .env content

NA

Reproduction steps

1. Have different images with the same subject (for example a cat) but with different dates
2. Make sure that the search task has finished for those images
3. Search for the subject
4. Images are not sorted by date and this cannot be changed

Relevant log output

No response

Additional information

No response

Originally created by @JordyEGNL on GitHub (Aug 15, 2024). ### The bug The search results are not sorted. In my opinion they should be sorted by newest first. ### The OS that Immich Server is running on NA ### Version of Immich Server v1.112.0 ### Version of Immich Mobile App v1.112.0 ### Platform with the issue - [ ] Server - [X] Web - [X] Mobile ### Your docker-compose.yml content ```YAML NA ``` ### Your .env content ```Shell NA ``` ### Reproduction steps ```bash 1. Have different images with the same subject (for example a cat) but with different dates 2. Make sure that the search task has finished for those images 3. Search for the subject 4. Images are not sorted by date and this cannot be changed ``` ### Relevant log output _No response_ ### Additional information _No response_
OVERLORD commented 2026-02-05 09:42:29 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@bo0tzz commented on GitHub (Aug 15, 2024):

The search results are sorted by relevance.

@bo0tzz commented on GitHub (Aug 15, 2024): The search results are sorted by relevance.
OVERLORD commented 2026-02-05 09:42:31 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@JordyEGNL commented on GitHub (Aug 15, 2024):

The search results are sorted by relevance.

Could make it an option? To search by relevance or date?

@JordyEGNL commented on GitHub (Aug 15, 2024): > The search results are sorted by relevance. Could make it an option? To search by relevance or date?
OVERLORD commented 2026-02-05 09:42:33 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@schuhbacca commented on GitHub (Aug 15, 2024):

The search results are sorted by relevance.

Could make it an option? To search by relevance or date?

How would you see that working out of curiosity? When you search for "cat" it brings up the most relevant results in that order. How would you also sort by date then?

You would need an arbitrary "relevance" cutoff that could then be sorted, but that is a number that would be very hard to define more than likely.

@schuhbacca commented on GitHub (Aug 15, 2024): > > The search results are sorted by relevance. > > Could make it an option? To search by relevance or date? How would you see that working out of curiosity? When you search for "cat" it brings up the most relevant results in that order. How would you also sort by date then? You would need an arbitrary "relevance" cutoff that could then be sorted, but that is a number that would be very hard to define more than likely.
OVERLORD commented 2026-02-05 09:42:35 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@JordyEGNL commented on GitHub (Aug 15, 2024):

You're right, there should be a relevance cutoff in order to only show the relevant assets.

@JordyEGNL commented on GitHub (Aug 15, 2024): You're right, there should be a relevance cutoff in order to only show the relevant assets.
OVERLORD commented 2026-02-05 09:42:38 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@dvelayosmd commented on GitHub (Nov 18, 2024):

i get the "relevance" argument, but when you have a lot of "relevant" images, the search result seems a chaos.

it would be great to have a way to sort the results by date as an option on the result page

@dvelayosmd commented on GitHub (Nov 18, 2024): i get the "relevance" argument, but when you have a lot of "relevant" images, the search result seems a chaos. it would be great to have a way to sort the results by date as an option on the result page
OVERLORD commented 2026-02-05 09:42:41 +03:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jamesob commented on GitHub (Feb 18, 2025):

Yeah agree, search is pretty useless IMO right now without an "order-by" function. E.g. I'll often have written something down, take a picture, and look for it later. Without search ordering, this is useless. Google Photos also offers this functionality.

@jamesob commented on GitHub (Feb 18, 2025): Yeah agree, search is pretty useless IMO right now without an "order-by" function. E.g. I'll often have written something down, take a picture, and look for it later. Without search ordering, this is useless. Google Photos also offers this functionality.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
accessibility
changelog:enhancement
changelog:security
changelog:skip
changelog:translation
cli
date-time
dependencies
documentation
external-library
format
good first issue
mobile-beta
mobile-beta
mobile-beta
needs-answer
nice to have
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 sharing
tech-debt
📱mobile
🖥️web
🗄️server
🧠machine-learning
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
OVERLORD
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: immich-app/immich#4080
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?